Equity-Skills News & Views
    SOUTH AFRICA'S most widely distributed & read INDEPENDENT HUMAN RESOURCE PUBLICATION
    ISSN 1684-5722

 

 

  Member Content

  Subscribe to Feeds

  Member Login

  Alphabetical Index

  Labour Legislation

  Workshops & Training

  HR Guides & Templates

  Knowledge Resources

  Newsletters

  Surveys

  Discussion Forums

  Abbrev. & Acronyms
  BEE Certificate

  What's New

  Membership Centre

  Subscribe

  Renew Membership

  Preview Content

  Caselaw.co.za

  Workinfo.com

Workinfo.com is now accepting credit card payments instantly.

  Caselaw.co.za

  Labour Court Search

  CCMA Awards

  Subscriptions

  About Workinfo.com

  Contact Us

  Customer Service

  About Workinfo.com

  Notices & Disclaimers

  Security Notices

  Shop.workinfo.com

  Online Shopping

  Publications

  Courses & Workshops

  Affiliate Programme

 

  Services

  Recruitment Services

  Consulting Services

 

 

Equity Skills News & Views
Volume 5, Issue 6, 31 March 2006
Registered as an electronic newspaper: ISSN 1684-5722

In This edition:

1. Confusion And Poor Leadership Hindering Diversity Drive
2. Strategic Partners: Organizational Development And IT   
3. Maximizing Value for the Business Through Strategic Human Capital Planning* 
4. Book Review: How People Tick: A Guide To Difficult People And How To Handle Them
5. Case-Law & Legislation Review:
A Review Of The Most Important Judgments From 2005
6. Downloads: Deloitte Study: It’s 2008: Do You Know Where Your Talent Is? Why Acquisition And Retention Strategies Don’t Work
7. Unsubscribe & Moving Soon

NB: If your Internet service provider (ISP) or server administrator filters incoming e-mail, please add Equity Skills News & Views to your list of approved senders to ensure you receive this e-journal to which you are subscribed.

Jeff Sacht : Publisher-editor
www.equityskillsweb.com
jeffs@worldonline.co.za

'A MUST TO PRINT & READ'
>24,000 & still growing!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

1. Confusion And Poor Leadership Hindering Diversity Drive*

By Nic Paton who can be contacted at www.management-issues.com

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Efforts to employ a more diverse workforce commonly come unstuck because firms fail to manage diversity programmes properly, become confused about what they want to do and get wrapped up in percentages, a U.S consultancy has warned.

Novations/J. Howard & Associates has identified a series of key reasons why diversity and inclusion programmes so often end in disappointment.

The first is that firms often get confused between diversity and inclusion initiatives, it said.

The metrics firms use to define a successful diversity programme differ from those used to assess an inclusion initiative, it explained.

While diversity centres mostly on representation, inclusion needs to reflect organisational health factors, including employee engagement, it said.

"Companies frequently implement an initiative expecting it to affect the wrong set of metrics," the study warned.

"A diverse company is not necessarily inclusive, and an inclusive company may be just that, with little impact on representation. So both kinds of initiatives are needed," it added.

Another factor is that companies fail to manage their initiatives well, frequently struggling with who is taking ownership of them.

Directors or vice-presidents of diversity will end up working in glorious, and often completely ineffectual, isolation.

"Successful companies ensure that diversity initiatives are owned by the business units and held accountable," said Novations/J. Howard & Associates.

But the most common shortcoming of diversity programmes is that companies end up focusing just on the delivery of training and the percentage of employees who have "completed" such training, it stressed.

"Diversity directors may provide training and tools, but they will be used by only a few employees if the organisation's attitude is really one of 'doing what I should do only while people are looking'," it argued.

"Successful organisations seek to internalise the commitment to inclusion and look for evidence in decision-making, promotion criteria, strategic direction and professional development," it added.

Fourth, even though many organisations will do good work in diversity and inclusion, when a new diversity director starts there may be a strong temptation to get rid of everything that has gone before and start afresh.

"So the organisation is blanketed with training or cultural awareness events or activities that look like diversity work," the study concluded.

"The projects or activities may in fact be worthwhile. Nevertheless, such a scattershot approach may miss critical targets or 'tipping points' where less effort and better pacing would have greater impact," it added.

At the same time, companies were often reluctant to measure and assess where they are in the diversity process because asking for feedback raises expectations, and ignoring these answers may make an organisation vulnerable to litigation, it warned.

"A well-managed measurement and assessment process can save the company time and money, and deliver short-term wins that will support the long-term initiative," it added.

Finally, management often fear that their organisation will become unwieldy if the performance curve changes dramatically and so are reluctant fully to embrace the challenge posed by the diversity/inclusiveness agenda, it said.

"As with any business strategy an organisation must be willing to take risks to make change happen," said Gerry Lupacchino, vice-president of Novations/J. Howard.

"Management has to know what it wants to impact, define what success would look like, work in a focused way and not be afraid of the changes that result," he added

*Reprinted by permission of the editor of Management Issues: www.management-issues.com

----------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Strategic Partners: Organizational Development And IT

By Andrew Gebavi who can be contacted at www.wpsmag.com

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Since the explosion of technologies in the workplace that began in the late 1980s, organizational development and IT functions within organizations have maintained a somewhat strained coexistence—more like oil and water than peanut butter and jelly. Interestingly, new developments in performance management, learning and collaborative technologies are now bringing the two fields closer together as technology is leveraged to help deliver tightly focused, high-impact OD efforts in support of organizational strategies and goals.

The 1990s were marked by the widespread adoption of e-mail and information technology that automated many of the traditional HR transactional functions such as the administration of hiring, terminations, organizational transfers, benefits and payroll. While the adoption of these technologies resulted in increased operational efficiencies in the HR function, organizational development professionals would often elude to the fact that all the new technology was “dehumanizing” the workplace or driving a wedge through typical “high touch” person-to-person transactions.

Although there might have been a grain of truth to that assertion, there is a convergence taking place within HCM and collaborative technologies that supports many of the traditional OD functions, which tend to focus on open lines of communication, organizational growth and alignment, and maximizing the potential of all the organization’s members while executing organizational strategy. This convergence is being driven by a shift in the perspective of executives who now see the HR function as strategic rather than as a cost center and an evolution in system integration technologies that allow systems to work together more easily. Technology vendors are tapping into the opportunities these trends generate and developing applications to meet the demands of customers. Astute OD professionals realize the value these new technologies bring to their efforts and use them to achieve the other side of the HCM equation—business value creation.

Talent Management

Talent management is a term that represents the convergence and integration of functions associated with succession planning, recruiting, developing and deploying talent, engaging, rewarding and retaining top talent, performance management and workforce planning. Using software offerings from the major ERP suite vendors or “best-of-breed” performance management and learning management system vendors, OD professionals can now get an accurate inventory of talent within their organizations, identify gaps between the staff executing organizational strategy and the current talent pool, and create strategies to close the talent gaps. The use of standard competencies enables each staff member’s skill set to be defined, tracked and flagged for development if necessary. The completion of specific learning and development activities can be linked to the achievement of competencies and automatically updated via integration with an LMS, thereby ensuring that the talent and skills inventory is current.

Prior to the tight integrations of the disparate processes the new systems offered, talent management processes were mostly manual and labor-intensive. OD professionals can now report on the talent inventory of their organizations with relative ease, allowing them to devote more time and effort to the true mission of their roles—developing strategies and interventions to improve the effectiveness of their organizations. The accuracy and depth of the data the new systems provide enables them to focus their efforts on quickly developing strategies to close specific talent gaps in support of the most pressing business goals.

Link of Performance Management and Learning

The convergence of performance management and learning technologies provides OD professionals with the tools to accomplish two of their primary goals more effectively:

>> Provide relevant learning activities to targeted audiences.

>> Enable managers increased depth and relevance in their conversations with their team members regarding performance.

Many of today’s LMSs allow “prescriptive learning,” which targets specific audiences with learning activities relevant to their roles, improving the operational efficiency of what has traditionally been a manual process. For example, over the past several years much attention has been focused on Sarbanes-Oxley and corporate compliance and the requisite training they entail. The new convergent technologies allow role-based e-learning compliance training to be added automatically to the online development plans of specific employees upon hire, monitored through the performance review process and taken into account for succession planning and internal mobility decisions. The completion of this training can be tracked automatically and reminder e-mails triggered at specific date intervals for those employees who have not completed the training. OD and compliance professionals then have access to current, accurate data detailing the organization’s compliance level. These same processes also could be used to track training for sales staff during new product launches or any other organizational change requiring a mass training effort.

With the help of integrated systems, managers and employees can craft specific development plans at the time of a performance review. By leveraging leading performance management technologies and standardized competency models aligned with business strategy, organizations can help managers coach team members on ways to improve specific skills and competencies and more effectively meet goals. Besides bringing context to often-ambiguous performance evaluation conversations, linking performance management to learning allows managers and team members to assign specific learning activities and timelines for completion based on team members’ competency profiles. Development plans are accessible to both managers and team members throughout the year, providing insight into employee progress. Once competency profiles are established for all employees, they are included in the organizational talent inventory as detailed in the previous talent management section.

HCM technologies also have enabled the organization-development mission in some unexpected ways. For example, some of the newest authoring tools to hit the market, originally intended to ease the creation of e-learning and online tests and evaluations, are now being leveraged by OD professionals to assist in their data collection efforts for organizational assessments. Typically, data collection efforts have involved hours of live interviews, paper processes and subjective filtering of the data collected. Using the new testing and assessment tools in conjunction with LMSs, OD professionals can craft online surveys that can be pushed to targeted mass audiences within the organization regardless of geography, size or hierarchy. The results are stored in a database, which enables reporting that yields more meaningful results (correlations, trends, modeling, etc.). The new technologies enable data to be collected on a much larger scale and to be evaluated much more efficiently and objectively. This allows OD resources an increased level of specificity and visibility into trends within their organizational data and the ability to deliver focused interventions based on the increased visibility.

Collaborative Technologies

In addition to the realization of true, integrated talent management and the ongoing convergence between the performance management and learning functions, the evolution of collaborative technologies such as portals, online discussion groups, real-time chat and webcasts also have provided valuable capabilities that promote the organization development mission.

Portal technology offers a wide variety of tools for the OD professional to promote increased organizational effectiveness, enable open communication and knowledge sharing and deliver multi-dimensional organizational change efforts. Properly implemented portals knit together disparate business applications and, in effect, present a composite application tailored to the role of the user in the organization. By presenting business tools, data and content to users via an easy-to-use, personalized interface, portals support the primary OD goals of increased organizational effectiveness and performance. Used in combination with content management systems, portals also become valuable communication and knowledge-sharing vehicles by presenting online content filtered by the language, geography or role of the user. Best practices, compliance information and strategic content can be pushed simultaneously to geographically diverse internal and external (customers, partners, suppliers) audiences. The top portal vendors also integrate search capability into their products, allowing users to search for the content that meets their needs. Prior to the advent of portal technologies, organizations were restricted to a “one size fits all” approach to pushing applications and content to employees. Portals allow the creation of a user experience that is tailored to the employee’s demographics.

In addition to the delivery vehicle of portals, the popularity of online discussion groups, instant messaging and webcasts in the public domain illustrates the immense potential for these mediums to facilitate organizational communication and knowledge-sharing. Organizations are becoming increasingly adept at using these technologies, and OD professionals are recognizing their potential to promote organizational effectiveness and change.

Online discussion groups, weblogs and wikis offer users the ability to post questions, comments and general information at a central online location. These types of forums are particularly well suited for the ongoing, system-wide communication required during large organizational change efforts. Typically, these discussion forums are created to focus on topics related to specific training programs, practice areas or operational best practices. The questions or comments posted can be directed toward specific experts, facilitators or to the general group membership, creating an open, collaborative process. Unlike real-time communication vehicles, these online discussions can take place over a period of weeks rather than minutes. The content of the discussions can be made searchable and becomes part of the organization’s knowledge base for future reference. When delivered through portal technology, links to specific discussion forums can be made available to individuals based on their demographics.

In contrast to asynchronous online discussion groups, instant messaging and online chats offer organizations a much more immediate form of real-time collaboration. Both of these mediums combine the immediacy of the telephone and the audit ability of e-mail. Most enterprise instant messaging applications now allow users to form real-time instant group chats by pulling multiple users into an online discussion as needed. Users can also share content (documents, slides, graphics) during their chats to facilitate understanding. Instant messaging technology is particularly useful when immediate information exchange is required (customer service, call center, etc.) by a small number of users.

For larger audiences, scheduled online chats are effective vehicles for mass interactive communication. Executives and subject-matter experts can communicate to mass audiences and answer questions on the fly regardless of geography through scheduled chat sessions. Participation in the chats is usually voluntary and users also have the ability to join the chats anonymously, which promotes open, informal and candid discussion. Online chat sessions are increasingly being used in OD efforts that involve large-scale organizational change and require frequent mass communication. The contents of both instant message sessions and scheduled online chats can be saved and made searchable for future reference. Prior to these chat technologies, interactive conversations would require conference calls, real-time office visits and herding masses of people into meeting rooms for live face-to-face dialogue. Although the online collaborative applications have not replaced more traditional live meetings, they have presented viable alternatives that augment the efforts of OD professionals and lead to increased organizational effectiveness.

Online audio/video technologies are also becoming mainstream tools OD professionals use to disseminate information quickly and efficiently. Live training or informational events are often shared organization-wide via webcasts and recorded for later use. Audio or video combined with many of the newer e-learning authoring tools allows other content (slides, text, graphics) to be displayed along with the video or audio for a media-rich user experience. The newest of the online audio/video technologies are podcasts, which combine the standard recorded webcast with “publish/subscribe” functionality. Publish/subscribe functionality allows the user to subscribe to specific subject areas and have the content automatically pushed to their computer or MP3 player whenever new content is available. The user can then view or listen to the content whenever his or her schedule allows. Although podcasts are not yet widely used in organizational communication, their popularity in the public domain is a glimpse of the potential of this evolving medium. Previous to the use of the online audio/video technologies, organizations would distribute videotaped content via mail to all their far-flung locations. Employees would view the video individually or congregate in meeting rooms to watch the video presentations.

Building Strategic Partnerships

In short, the revolution taking place in HCM and collaborative technologies has created new and unexpected strategic partnerships between OD and IT professionals. OD professionals, who were once leery of the influx of technology into the workplace, are now beginning to realize the value that emerging technologies offer and use them to achieve the other side of the HCM equation—business value creation. Whether leveraging these technologies as tools to promote large-scale organizational change, gain visibility into their workforce or promote free-flowing communication, the new integrated solutions are enabling OD professionals to bring increased efficiency, accuracy and focus to their efforts.

Andrew Gebavi, MSOD, is a principal consultant at Knowledge Infusion and founder of LMS Projects Inc. He has spent the past 20 years helping organizations transform through the use of technology. He can be reached at agebavi@wpsmag.com.

Van Meter Industrial: HR & IT Team for Cost Savings Olivia Nix on

Van Meter Industrial runs manufacturing and processing facilities in 19 locations across Iowa, building products for several industries including automation, computer, datacom and electrical. Continually striving to improve client service, Van Meter looked inward to enhance employee commitment by automating and improving annual employee performance reviews for its 400 workers.

The first step for HR was to consult with the information technology group. Previously, HR had sourced and purchased an HR system without IT’s assistance. While the system met HR needs, the product required expensive, ongoing consulting expertise and a lot of IT staff time—a hard lesson.

HR and IT need to work together. HR knows what features are needed to fulfill legal requirements and to achieve business goals. IT understands technological requirements and what the company’s systems can support. In addition, IT typically has more experience in purchasing and supporting large programs and applications.

Together, Van Meter’s HR and IT teams calculated the overreaching goal—to reduce the organization’s review process costs by 15 percent. This objective was calculated by adding the reduced travel by employees and supervisors, the reduced amount of manual work by the HR department and time saved not having to sift through a year’s worth of employees’ handwritten notes.

Next, they developed selection criteria:

>> Ease of use.

>> Ease of administration.

>> Minimal additional support required by IT.

>> Ability to automate processes and follow-up notifications.

>> A stand-alone application.

After assessing several solutions, Van Meter chose Halogen Software’s hosted eAppraisal solution for its ease of use and simplicity and because it was not part of an HRIS package. “We believed that if we overloaded our people with a complicated system, they wouldn’t buy into the process and would put up resistance,” said Den Henrickson, senior system administrator at Van Meter.

Van Meter purchased a training package to get things right from the start. The vendor trained several HR and IT help desk staff who in turn trained the remaining staff—one hour for employees and two hours for managers.

Henrickson’s team had budgeted six months to roll out the new system, but launched its first appraisal process in less than 30 days after receiving training on the product.

The benefits of an automated system include:

Managers and employees update and maintain notes electronically in a single location.

By using electronic signatures, managers no longer need paper processes (less travel).

Those managers still required to travel can complete evaluations while on the road.

Compared to the previous year’s appraisals, the results were more uniform (format and the types of comments).

Following the product’s guidelines, users stay within acceptable corporate standards resulting in more consistent reviews.

Most importantly, the majority of reviews were completed in a timely manner.

Van Meter significantly surpassed its original goal of an overall cost savings of 15 percent per review to reach an overall cost savings of 85 percent.

“Believe it or not, the feedback has been universally positive,” Henrickson said. “This has never happened to me before. Not even the people who are completely phobic over computers have complained. This was the only product I’ve rolled out in eight years that I haven’t received any negative feedback from users.”

Olivia Nix on writes on technology-related topics and issues, with a focus on solutions for HR, including performance management systems. She can be reached at onixon@wpsmag.com.

*Reprinted by permission of the editor of CLO Media

----------------------------------------------------------------------

3. Maximizing Value for the Business Through Strategic Human Capital Planning*

By Matthew C. Brush and Donald H. Ruse who can be contacted at www.sibson.com

----------------------------------------------------------------------

How Corning Links Business and HR Strategy to Improve the Value and Impact of Its HR Function

The HR function at Corning, Incorporated, considers human capital planning (HCP) a critical business process because of its transformational impact on the value the function delivers to the business and the way it delivers that value. With HCP, HR has the opportunity to get and keep a seat at the strategic decision-making table. Corning uses HCP to improve its ability to identify human capital implications of corporate strategy and reshape HR services to better support the business. This article shares the evolution of HCP at Corning, the process and tools in place, its business impact, and key lessons learned in designing and implementing this critical business process.

Corning: A Legacy of Innovation

The evolution of human capital planning at Corning directly reflects the history of Corning itself. Corning is a 150+ year-old firm with a record of successful process and materials innovation in support of life-changing products, a record that stretches all the way back to the invention of a shatter-resistant lens for railroad lanterns in 1874 (see Figure 1).

Corning has historically maintained a diverse portfolio of businesses based on a common desire to be first to market with products that have functional advantages for customers and strong intellectual property protection against potential competitors. Talented employees have remained central to the company’s ability to sustain an innovation- based business model, regardless of how the specific mix of products in the portfolio have changed over time.

A Wake-Up Call for Corning: The Impact of the Telecommunications Bubble

Corning’s traditional strategy of maintaining a balanced portfolio was sorely tested by the telecommunications boom of the late 1990s, which ended in one of the most difficult industry contractions since the boom-bust cycles experienced in the U.S. railroad and steel industries in the late 19th and early 20th centuries.

The collapse of the telecom bubble, and its impact on Corning’s profitability threatened the company’s viability and forced a serious re-evaluation of Corning’s business plans and processes. The analysis included tough decisions regarding the portfolio of businesses on which Corning would continue to make bets on future growth, and resulted in the sale of several large businesses. During this time, Corning shed nearly half of its workforce and shrank from over 40,000 employees to just over 20,000. The mix of talent required shifted away from the optical, electronic, and systems specialties demanded by the telecommunications businesses back to materials and process specialties demanded by the environmental and display technologies businesses.

While the business portfolio was being reshaped, the corporation re-evaluated its investments in corporate staffs. Corning considered, and ultimately rejected, several proposals to outsource a range of staff functions that included procurement, human resources, information technology, and finance, choosing instead to centralize these functions to gain greater leverage from functional structure while significantly reducing costs. This process generated new performance expectations for each of these functions. Each group was challenged to sharpen its ability to add value to Corning’s portfolio of businesses. In response to this challenge, Human Resources renewed its focus on building functional capability and service offerings that ensure each business has the right number, quality, and type of talent needed to execute its strategy, and gets the highest and best use from that talent portfolio. The development of a robust human capital planning process was integral to HR’s efforts to improve its ability to forecast human capital requirements in support of the business and enable the organization to get—and stay—ahead of the talent curve.

HR Transformation at Corning

“We started rethinking the HR organization during the explosive business growth we enjoyed in the late ‘90s, but those efforts took on added urgency during the unprecedented business contraction we faced from 2001 through 2003,” says Kurt Fischer, Corning’s Vice President of Human Resources . “We’ve had to question everything from the way we define HR’s core capabilities to our service delivery model, while simultaneously reducing global headcount by 50% and cutting HR costs.”

As often happens with staff groups, Corning’s HR functional growth lagged behind the organic and acquisition-driven growth of the business during the boom period, despite its best efforts to staff up. As business growth slowed and reversed, HR’s workload in support of the restructuring actually increased. When the dust cleared from the telecom contraction, HR found itself with a cost footprint much too large when compared to top-quartile HR organizations, whether expressed as total HR spend per employee or the ratio of total employees supported to HR employees. The challenge of correctly allocating resources was heightened by the shift in Corning’s employee base from a largely Mid-Atlantic North American concentration to a primarily non-U.S. distribution, a shift that had profound implications for institutional mindset as well as headcount.

FIGURE 1--100 YEARS OF CORNING INNOVATIONS

Download a PDF copy of the full text of this article including graphics at http://www.workinfo.com/free/downloads/180.htm

Corning’s historical business model was that of multiple distinct businesses, as many as 10 or 12 in various stages of maturity, operating in a mostly decentralized fashion with little product/technology overlap. This model enabled the units to develop their specific technologies and products and build intimate customer relationships based on market knowledge. This decentralized business model also permeated staff functions, including Human Resources . Business units had relatively independent HR organizations that generally did not communicate at an enterprise level the specific human capital needs of their respective businesses. It was not uncommon for multiple divisions to tackle similar human capital issues independently, the redundant efforts increasing the overall cost of HR to the organization.

Corporate HR functions at Corning were based on centers of excellence (COEs) in areas such as compensation and benefits, learning and development, employee relations, and recruiting. The COEs had a long history of developing innovative programs, often at the request of senior corporate managers. This approach occasionally resulted in the deployment of initiatives that may or may not have been aligned with the priorities of individual businesses in Corning’s portfolio. The subsequent “hit or miss” performance in terms of business relevance and, most importantly, business impact was often disappointing for all parties. It also resulted in field HR organizations taking on COE-like roles so that their specific business needs would be met.

Combined with a decentralized HR field model, this approach to program development contributed to the perception that HR was not aligned with the needs of the business and that the function, at an enterprise level, was too costly in comparison to value delivered.

HR leadership recognized that a clear set of transformation goals was needed; that those goals must be supported by a common approach and language that enabled all of HR to understand client businesses’ strategies and the human capital requirements necessary to achieve the desired business results at the division and enterprise level. Doing so would enable HR to align more effectively with the critical needs of the corporation and efficiently deliver a suite of HR services that supported execution of corporate and division business strategy. Corning established four key goals to direct HR’s efforts to transform itself into a more value-adding function with a seat at the decision making table. “The transformational goals we established during the days of rapid growth were robust enough to remain valuable during the downturn” says Fischer. “In fact, they’re still at the core of our strategic plans for HR in the foreseeable future.” The model Corning developed (see Figure 2) describes a recipe of success that reflects both its recent past and its future.

FIGURE 2--HR TRANSFORMATION GOALS

Download a PDF copy of the full text of this article including graphics at http://www.workinfo.com/free/downloads/180.htm

The first transformational goal, business linkage, requires HR professionals across the function to draw a clear and direct connection between the strategies of the corporation’s businesses—both individually and collectively—and the human capital implications of those strategies. Through this ability, HR can help the corporation better understand future talent requirements in terms of the number, type, and quality of people needed to execute on its strategy and understand what actions are required to realize the maximum return from its talent investments.

The global and scalable goals address HR’s need to build capabilities where and when the client businesses need them—largely outside North America and in countries and businesses that will inevitably change as current and emerging businesses continue to evolve. The top-quartile cost goal is intended to ensure that HR remains within the boundaries of appropriate total cost to deliver required services. Typical benchmarks include ratios of HR staff to employees supported, total HR spend per employee, and HR spend as a percent of company revenues, compared to peer companies with similar revenues, business complexity, and HR service offerings.

Download a PDF copy of the full text of this article including graphics at http://www.workinfo.com/free/downloads/180.htm

----------------------------------------------------------------------
4. Book Review: How People Tick: A Guide To Difficult People And How To Handle Them

----------------------------------------------------------------------
# How People Tick: A Guide to Difficult People and How to Handle Them

To buy this book click on: http://www.kalahari.net/e-trader/referral.asp?toolbar=mweb&linkid=5&partnerid=293&sku=28268709

By Mike Leibling, Kogan Page, 2005

When dealing with difficult people, it is often just one aspect of their behaviour that is particularly challenging. But that single characteristic can be very problematic! This is a practical guide to every type of difficult person and how best to handle them.

Packed with useful tips on how to deal with even the most irritating people, this provides real insights and solutions for a variety of difficult situations. Each situation is described, how it happens is analyzed, and then strategies for dealing with the problem successfully are suggested.

Disruptive behaviour patterns can be addressed once and for all, instead of having to handle one-off 'difficult' events, time and time again.

How People Tick is full of tried and tested tips for handling 'difficult' people in 'difficult' situations, based on a real understanding of their behaviour. It is for anyone who finds people bewildering or just plain difficult, and yet still wants to understand them, work with them and live with them.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
5. Case-Law & Legislation Review:
A Review Of The Most Important Judgments From 2005

Produced by Perrott, Van Niekerk & Woodhouse Inc.

www.caselaw.co.za | www.elaw.co.za

----------------------------------------------------------------------

The end of the last Court term of 2005 saw a number of important judgments handed down by the Labour Court s. Some of the key judgments are noted here. All of the cases are currently unreported.

>> What about the workers? By Andre van Niekerk
Section 197 of the LRA provides for the automatic transfer of employment contracts when a business is transferred in whole or in part as a going concern. But when does the business transfer? Is it the date of signature of the agreement, the date on which the new owner takes control or the effective date as defined by the contract?

In EC Van der Velde v Business and Design Software (PTY) Ltd and another this question assumed some significance, because the contract provided that employees would be transferred on the effective date (1 January) as defined by the contract. However, the agreement was only signed on 3 April, and was subject to conditions that were to be fulfilled by 4 April.

In essence, the Labour Court had to decide whether the parties to a sale agreement could provide for a retrospective transfer of the employment contracts. The answer to that question was significant for the applicant, who had been retrenched on 31 March. It was also significant for the seller, which argued that it should not be before the Court since it could not have dismissed the Applicant on 31 March, 3 months after the sale of the business. The date on which the transfer of his employment contract took place determined which of the employer parties had dismissed him- the purchaser (if his contract had transferred on 1 January) or the seller (if all employment contracts transferred only on 4 April). Although section 197 provides that the purchaser takes over all employment related liabilities and obligations (meaning that either way, the purchaser could be sued), the claim was one based on an automatically unfair reason for dismissal (a reason related to a section 197 transfer) and for that purpose, it became necessary to decide which employer had effected the dismissal.

The Court held that it was not bound by the intention of the seller and the purchaser, even if there was no fraudulent intent. To allow the employer parties to fix an arbitrary date as the effective date of the sale could lead to abuse. For the purposes of section 197, the date of transfer was the date on which the sale became unconditional and the date on which the purchaser assumed full control of the of the business bundle that was the subject of the transfer. On the facts of the case, that date as 4 April, when the sale became unconditional. Both employer parties were properly before the Court, and the case was adjourned for a hearing on the merits.

Effective dates are often inserted into contracts, mostly for reasons unrelated to labour issues. This decision illustrates the importance of properly considering and regulating the labour implications of any transaction, and not to leave these to the commercial and tax lawyers.

>> A question of detail – what information must an employer disclose with a section 189(3) notice? By Andre van Niekerk
Section 189(3) requires employers who contemplate retrenchment to issue an invitation to consult. This notice, which must be issued to defined consulting partners, must contain the information that is prescribed relating to the reasons for the proposed retrenchment, the numbers of employees likely to be affected, measures adopted to avoid retrenchment, etc. Is this section to be applied literally? In other words, is the retrenchment procedurally unfair simply because the employer fails to include all of the information envisaged by that section. In Chester Wholesale Meats) Pty) Ltd v National Industrial Workers Union of SA and 30 others, the Labour Court found against the employer on the basis that it had not strictly complied with section 189 because it had failed timeously to put all of the required matters in writing. The Labour Appeal Court took a different view. The Court held that the Labour Court had applied an overly technical approach, and that there was nothing in section 189 or 189A that required the initial notice of consultation to contain all of the required information. To hold otherwise would impose an 'impractical regime' on parties who are expected to embark on a joint consensus seeking exercise. In fact, to insist on commitment to undue detail may actually inhibit worthwhile consultation rather than promote it.

The judgment is certainly not a licence to err on the side of inadequacy when issuing a section 189(3) notice. But it does adopt a realistic view of the world- consultation is a dynamic process and information demands will reflect that. The judgment also emphasises that section 189 should not be technically interpreted- the courts will primacy to the purpose of the section, which is to ensure genuine consensus seeking on alternatives when redundancies are contemplated.

Still on the topic of section 189- when must an employer issue a section 189(3) notice? How far down the track of 'contemplation' can the employer go before issuing the notice?

>> How far does ‘contemplation’ stretch by Andre van Niekerk

In NEHAWU v University of Pretoria, the Labour Appeal Court had to determine whether the union had been presented with a fait accompli when it was notified of a proposed outsourcing of certain services. The union accused the employer of deciding to outsource before the consultation process had started. On the facts, the Court rejected this argument and found for the employer. The Court confirmed that what the employer could not do was arrive at a final decision to retrench before commencing consultation. An employer was entitled to come to the consultation table 'with a predisposition towards a particular method of solving the problem which has given rise to the contemplation of dismissal of employees for operational requirements. What is critical is that the employer should nevertheless be open to change its mind if persuasive argument is presented to it that that method is wrong or is not the best or that there is or may be another one that can address the problem equally well or even in a better way.'

This is a reaffirmation of the view that in the real world, employers will think through a number of solutions to business problems before retrenchments become possible or even inevitable, and that they are entitled to form preliminary or even preferred views before initiating a section 189 consultation process. What employers may not do is enter the consultation process with a closed mind. The section is geared to a joint exploration of alternatives, and has as its goal consensus on measures that would avoid retrenchment or ameliorate its consequences.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
6. Downloads: Deloitte Study: It’s 2008: Do You Know Where Your Talent Is? Why Acquisition And Retention Strategies Don’t Work*

By Robin Athey Deloitte Services LP who can be contacted at rathey@deloitte.com

SPONSORED BY DELOITTE SOUTH AFRICA: For additional information about Human Capital Consulting contact David Conradie on dconradie@deloitte.co.za; http://www.deloitte.com/dtt/home/0,1044,sid%253D23586,00.html  ----------------------------------------------------------------------

Despite millions of unemployed workers, there is an acute shortage of talent: science educators to teach the next generation of chemists, health care professionals of all stripes, design engineers with deep technical and interpersonal skills,and seasoned marketers who understand the Chinese marketplace. Resumes abound, yet companies still feverishly

search for the people who make the difference between 10 percent and 20 percent annual growth, or between profit and loss. Critical talent is scarce, and about to become much more scarce because of two looming trends: the retirement of the Baby Boom generation and a growing skills gap. By “critical talent,” we refer to the groups and individuals that drive a disproportionate share of their company’s business performance and generate greater-than-average value for customers and shareholders. A company’s critical talent possesses highly developed skills and deep knowledge—not just of the work itself but also of “how to make things happen” in the organization. Without these people, organizations could not achieve their strategies. (See sidebar,“Who Is Critical Talent?”)

We are not necessarily referring to the “A players” or senior executives who command the highest salaries. More often we’re talking about employees who don’t end up in the annual report. They include the scientists and clinicians who discover and develop the blockbuster drugs that fuel pharmaceutical companies’ growth. In the oil industry, they include the geologists and petroleum engineers who find and extract oil. In manufacturing, they include the machinists who perform precision manufacturing to Six Sigma standards. And in retailing, they may be the inventory managers who get the right goods in the right stores at the right time.

When the knowledge and skills of critical talent become scarce, recruiting wars erupt. Many leading companies fight these wars differently. They do not succumb to bidding wars, knowing that the “star” who chases high offers will be out the door as soon as the next higher one rolls in. Nor do they bribe talent to stay, knowing that monetary incentives do not foster long-term commitment; worse still, they can mask discontent that infects others. Rather than focus on acquiring and retaining talent, talent savvy organizations support their key people on the issues they care about most: doing work that engages them, learning how to do it even better, encountering fresh challenges, and interacting with people in positive ways.

Firms like Microsoft, Southwest Airlines, and SAS Institute are exemplary in the way they nurture and manage critical talent. They go to surprising lengths to help these employees tap into their core skills and passions. They expect continuous learning and growth and know that the most important lessons don’t take place in the classroom, but on the job. They also understand that positive relationships raise the performance of critical talent to new levels.

Download a copy of this research article at http://www.workinfo.com/free/downloads/180.htm

*Reprinted by permission of the author

---------------------------------------------------------------------
7. Unsubscribe & Moving Soon
----------------------------------------------------------------------
UNSUBSCRIBE: Scroll to the end of the newsletter where you will find a code directly linked to your name. Click on the unsubscribe link. PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS NEWSLETTER TO UNSUBSCRIBE. MOVING SOON: If you are changing your email address soon and would still like to continue receiving this newsletter, please email us your new or temporary email address to ensure that you do not miss out on the next edition.
------------------------------------
About the e-Journal/e-Newspaper
------------------------------------
Equity-Skills News & Views is a free bi-monthly newsletter for business owners, Line Managers, and Human Resource Practitioners (who support Line Managers) with the implementation of fair and developmental people management systems and practices. The style of this e-Newspaper fits between the traditional email newsletters and printed professional trade journals & magazines. Subscribers will be kept up to date with the latest developments in the world of people management, receive handy people management tips, and feedback about labour court rulings that relate to the implementation of the key Labour Acts. Please add equity skills news & views to your list of approved senders if your Internet provider or server administrator filters incoming e-mail, to make sure you receive periodic e-mail alerts and this newsletter to which you are subscribed.
------------------------------------
Opinions expressed by contributors DO NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENT the standpoint of the publisher-editor of Equity-Skills News & Views. Information published here is for general information, and is not intended as legal advice. The authors, editors, and publishers do not accept responsibility for any act, omission, loss, or damage occasioned by any reliance upon the contents hereof.

This message is sent in compliance with the ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS AND TRANSACTIONS ACT. 2002, Act No. 25, 2002 [South Africa] passed on 20 May 2003.

Sender: Jeff Sacht
URL:
www.equityskillsweb.com
E-mail:
jeffs@worldonline.co.za
Telephone: +27 011 485 4943
Facsimile +27 011 485 4943
Publisher-Editor: Equity-Skills News & Views
'A MUST TO PRINT & READ'
------------------------------------
Copyright (c) 2004 Registered electronic newspaper: 1SSN 1684-5714

 

   
© 2002 Equity Skills New & Views.  All Rights Reserved.                            ISSN 1684-5714